Monday, December 23, 2019

Jewish Americans Stand on Isreal and Palestin Conflict Essay

The aim of this study was to explore among a sample of Jewish Americans the prevalence of beliefs associated with intractable conflict and to test the role of different beliefs in predicting individuals’ support for a compromise solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. We found that the Jewish Americans we sampled tended to agree with a sense of collective victimhood and the Jewish Israeli narrative on the conflict. On the other hand they tended to disagree with the Palestinian narrative on the conflict and with statements that dehumanized the Palestinians and on average did not frame the conflict in terms of a zero-sum game. Jewish Americans in our sample tended to fall in the middle in terms of their endorsement of compromise†¦show more content†¦It also appears that when controlling for variance explained by demographic variables and attachment to Israel, education level emerges as a predictor for rejection of peaceful solutions. Individuals who are mor e educated were more likely to refuse concessions to the Palestinians. This finding can per- haps be explained by the influence of millions of dollars invested in engaging Jewish college students with Israeli culture and the Israeli view of the conflict; thus spending more time informal education leads to more refusal to compromise with the Palestinians (Beinart, 2010, 2012). The central focus of this study was the question of which belief suggested by theorists best predicts individuals’ support for or rejection of peaceful solutions to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Our findings are in line with previous research from Israel that suggests that dehumanization and a zero-sum view on the conflict serve an important role in predicting individuals’ support for the perpetuation of conflict (Halperin et al., 2008; Halperin Bar-Tal, 2011; Hammack et al., 2011; Maoz Eidelson, 2007; Maoz McCauley, 2005, 2008). Importantly, our study contributes an additional novel predictor to the current literature based on our operationalization of a monolithic narrative on the conflict. The monolithic narrative variable, which is based on the level of acceptance of the Jewish narrative on the conflict (i.e., â€Å"we intend to live in peace but we must continually defend

Saturday, December 14, 2019

Topic Tourism Free Essays

Essay on topic â€Å"Tourism†. Tourism is becoming increasingly important as a source of revenue to many countries bit its disadvantages should not be overlooked. What are some of the problems of tourism? Often, people are surprised when they hear that the tourism industry has problems. We will write a custom essay sample on Topic Tourism or any similar topic only for you Order Now Indeed, many perceive tourism as a fascinating kind of rest that allows changing of scenery and lifestyle for a while. Whatever it was, tourism has not only advantages, but also disadvantages, such as pollution of the environment, the problems of population and security.The biggest problem of tourism is air and land pollution. In fact, the more people visiting the country, the more debris could be found there. Tourists go on picnics and visit the monuments and landmarks and everywhere leave trash behind them. Also, tourists often use transport: rent cars or use buses. All this transport produces many different toxic substances that pollute the air. The second problem of fast growing tourism is the problem of population. Some cities, which are very popular for tourists, are not big enough for the number of people, who visit them every year. Because of this, there is a problem of placing these people. Hotels are being built for tourists on the places that once used to be forests or parks.. There are crowds on the streets and traffic jams on the roads. The last problem of tourism, which affects this essay, is a security problem. Moreover, this problem concerns both tourists and indigenous people. After all, a tourist is an easy target for fraudsters and thieves as they are in unfamiliar territory and very often do not know the local language. They are very easy to be cheated or robbed. On the other hand, many criminals are among tourists. because they are in this country permanently, and they are very difficult to catch. In conclusion, tourism is very important sector for many countries. But we should not disregard and its shortcomings. And governments should try to find a solution to these problems; otherwise they can inflict great damage to those countries. How to cite Topic Tourism, Papers

Friday, December 6, 2019

Strategy Choice and Implementation Report of Coca-Cola Great Britain C

Question: Discuss about the Strategy Choice and Implementation Report of Coca-Cola Great Britain Company. Answer: Background of Coca-Cola Company Coca-cola Company is a public traded company that manufactures beverages. The company has its headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia in the United States of America. The company was founded in the year 1886. Currently, the company manufactures products for the world market. It has it presence in all world countries except Cuba and North Korea. The company is lead by Muhtar Kent who is the Chairman and CEO. James Quincy is the president and COO of the company (Coca-Cola Great Britain, 2009). Coca Cola is a leading beverages manufacturer that has diversified over time to accommodate changes and development in the society. The Company famous brand is coca cola which is the oldest and led to the starting of the company. The company also produces other brands like Fanta, sprite, Limca, Minute Maid etc. The company has the strongest brand recognition in the world. It has 94% recognition from the world population on the red and white logo of coke brand. In this report, coca cola brand has been discussed to identify it strategy and evaluate implementation process to conclude and recommend on it appropriateness (Curtis, 2005). The coca cola Great Britain has 18brands. These are contained in 82 different drinks that are sold to the British market. These drinks are Coca Cola, Diet Coke, Coca-Cola Life, Coke Zero, Sprite and Fanta. These products are packed in a variety of aluminum cans, plastic bottles and glasses. This subsidiary serves the United Kingdom and Western Europe market (Bromley and Meyer, 2015). The company has a mission of refreshing the world, inspiring moments and create value that makes difference through its products and actions. The company envisions that it will be a great place of work, manufacture quality beverages that satisfy customers needs, nurture a good relationship with suppliers and customers, be a responsible to earth and support sustainability to people around it, maximizes shareholders returns and be effective in order to be a fast moving organization (Coca-colacompany.com., 2016). Identification and evaluation of the chosen strategy One brand Strategy The company has continuously differentiated it products to serve specific niche in the market. From the one know product, the company differentiated the features to serve the changing needs of the society. This has led to the same product being sold under different brand names. For instance, due to changing society as a result of health disease caused by consumption of sugar, the company came up with a coke drink that was sugar free. The diversification of coke drink in Great Britain has taken four form; Diet Coke, Coca Cola Life and Coco Cola Zero Sugar. Despite these diversified brands of Coke, the original Coca-Cola Classic brand is still maintained. This strategy has enabled the company maintain its market share and increase return despite the changing society. Consumers who have become health conscious or are suffering obesity are served by the company in a differentiated brand that is manufactured in their specificity (Bromley and Meyer, 2015). This way, consumers will be able to make choice easier and simpler. This strategy will unite the entire coke brand In the past, CCGB has been advertising these Coke brands separately. Each brand was being promoted separated with different tailored made promotional marketing messages and channeled differently. This activity of creating awareness for the differentiated brands in media and other promotional channels has proven to be expensive for the company. Following a research that has been made by the research and development department of the company showed that consumers did not understand the options available to them. It established that despite the companys effort to make different promotional messages for different brands, consumers didnt differentiate brands on accounts of specific needs. Therefore, it not economical to generally continue with different promotional messages for different brands instead concentrates on one brand promotion. This led to formulation of the one brand strategy for the coke beverages in Great Britain. The company aims to use this one brand promotional message to promote all other differentiated brands. The strategy will market all the brands under one promotional message. Suitability of the one brand strategy The one brand strategy is as a result of lack of awareness from the intended consumers. The efforts of the company to offer tailored made promotional message for individual brand now narrowed to one brand. This strategy when implemented will have different implications to company and consumers. Though the new promotional strategy will capture the four brands, it will be general and not specific as tailored before. In order to evaluate the suitability of the strategy undertaken by CCGB, SWOT analysis, PESTLE analysis and Strategic goals have been discussed. Strategic goals for one brand strategy The strategic goal of one brand strategy id uniting the distinct brands so that they can benefit from superior and established brands. One brand approach strategy will unite the coke brands. The four distinct brands will be promoted under one Coca Cola name in the market. It is aimed that the low or no sugar brands will gain popularity by closer association with classic. Therefore, the company will be able to increase its sales for no or little sugar brands in Great Britain. This will be enable the company to reach it long term goal of 50% sales to be from lower or no sugar by 2020 (Coca-colacompany.com., 2016). In order to reach the strategic goal, the company is to make the following changes: All packaging will highlight important information of all distinct br5ands The Coke advert will showcase all the brands The Coke TV promotional messages will display all the brands at the end. All the cans and bottles of distinct brands will be of the same size and style differentiated by colors. Doubling the advertising budget for lower and no sugar brands ponsoring an international event of Rugby (Wang, 2015). SWOT Analysis The SWOT analysis considers the companys strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats at the time of strategy formulation and implementation. The Coca Cola Great Britain Company situation for the implementation of the strategy was as follows; Strengths Large market share: The Company has the largest market share in Great Britain market. The company is market leader in relation it competitors. This gives the company ability to reach a large mass of beverage consumers in the market. Customer loyalty: The Company enjoys a customer loyalty that it has created over years. Customers know the company brand and have preference to it products. Therefore, it can be said that the company enjoys freedom to make internal changes without losing customers (Curtis, 2005). High brand equity: The Companys Coca Cola brand enjoys the highest brand equity. This is because of it vast presence in the markets. It trade mark which is unique gives it a high brand equity. It was named as the highest valued trademark by Blumeyer in 2008 in the world. Availability of resources .The Company has an enough resources that it has accumulated over time. The company is able to finance it manufacturing and promotional activities without running risk of liquidation. This enables the company to engage in any profitable strategy despite initial spending. Good distribution channels: The Company has well established distribution channels throughout Britain. This facilitates the marketing process since the companys products are able to reach the intended consumers at the right timely and in the right form (Morris, 2005). Weaknesses Unable to contain Pepsi: The Company is not able to contain it main competitor Pepsi. The company is has no structure to prevent Pepsi from continued competition in the market. This forms a weakness in the company that can lead to tremendous decline in the companys sales. Therefore, the company should incorporate this factor when deciding on the appropriateness of the one brand strategy (Bhasin, 2016) Developing negative publicity: Due to increasing health conscious, carbonated drinks are highly blamed. Coca Cola being the largest producer of carbonated drinks in the market makes it a concern. Increased obesity in the society can be directly blamed to the company (Toryanik, 2016). Therefore, the company faces this factor has a weakness which can negatively influence it market performance and efforts are needed to prevent it advancement. Opportunities Market segmentation: the company has an opportunity of further segmenting the beverage market. The company can be able to target and win more consumers by producing more healthy products. This gives the company an opportunity of growth by pursuing the marketing of lower or no sugar products. Improvement of the supply chains: There is an opportunity of improving the supply chain in the distribution of Coke products in Britain. The efficiency in the supply chain can enable cost reduction which can lead to more return margins for the company. Threats Emerging indirect competitors: Coke beverages are facing indirect competition from other products such as tea and coffee that offer refreshing beverages to the same market. These competitors lower the market demand for Coke brands. Therefore, the market performances of Coke brands face a threat from increasing demand for indirect competing products. PESTLE Analysis This strategic tool analysis the political, economical, social, legal and environmental factors that affect the business when the strategy is formulated or being implemented. They are as follows; Political: This is the national political environments. It refers to regulations and legislation from the governments of the day. The government influences how the manufacturing process will be carried out. They set standards and when the company declines to a bid, it fined by the government. These includes labeling and ingredients used in manufacture or packaging of the product. Coke product fall under food category and therefore is regulated by Food Standards regulations (Morris, 2005). Therefore, the United Kingdom government regulations on food and beverage regulation will set the minimum requirements for the manufacture and tailoring of the promotional message. It is therefore the responsibility of CCGB to adhere to these regulations and submit taxes to avoid being inconvenienced. Economical Analysis This analysis refers to the economic performances that will either favor the strategy implementation or limit the effectiveness of the strategy. These factors are changes in income, inflation, interest rates or costs of inputs. These factors cause changes in demand and supply of the companys products. When economical factors increase consumers purchasing power, they lead to increased demand that increase the companys sales for the period. Therefore, these are macro factors that would affect one brand strategy and are behold the companys control. The company depends on forecasts to predict the likelihood of their occurrences and change accordingly. The company strives to maintain a low cost strategy in it production processes in order to be flexible in case of change in economic performances. Social Analysis This factor involves the people in their societies. They refer to changes in cultures over time. People continue to evolve that lead to change in lifestyles. When lifestyles change, people tend to change what they consume. The society at large in Britain has continuously changed in terms of eating habits and has become more health conscious over time. Therefore, there is a shift of taste and preference to more healthy diets. This necessitates companies to incorporate health factor in their products. Technological Analysis These are factors that lead to advancement in production methods and how business transactions are carried out. They increase efficiency in the business and whenever a company fails to adopt them, it gives their competitors a competitive edge. Therefore, technology is an important aspect in the business. The CCGB Company should embrace technology to lower it production costs and increase the effectiveness of marketing activities. Following the widespread of internet, the company should embark on promotional activities that reach mass customers at the lowest cost. Evaluation of the Strategy implementation Issues of One Brand Strategy This process involves the questioning of the implementation process to establish effectiveness of the implementation process to meet the strategic goal for the specified periods of time (Thompson Martin, 2010). The evaluation of implementation of one brand strategy by CCGB is based on how the implementation process ensured that the planned changes are effectively adopted and are achieving the intended goal. The implementation process determines the success of strategic plan. Therefore it how well the implementation process follows the strategic plan that determines the success or failure of the strategy. The CCGB strategic goal aims at uniting the four brands and offer support by gaining associates from established brand. The implementation process will be evaluated on the link to budget, employees and managers and the strategy. The benchmark of evaluation is the desired goal of the strategy and the proposed changes to be made. It is evident from the proposed changes that the CCGB has laid a double marketing budget for the year. This budget ensures that there are funds to market the lower or no sugar Coke drinks in the country. The budget will ensure that promotional activities are aggressive and of good quality to influence preferences of the targeted audiences. The employees are the ones who make the strategic changes and therefore are in the central point of the implementation of the strategy. Employees manufacture products and need to be linked to the strategy through incentives to facilitate their contribution to the strategy (Sekhar, 2012.). The involvement of employees is important for the effectiveness of the implementation process of the strategy. The marketing team that will create the promotional message should be motivated to enhance their effectiveness in implementing the strategic goal of the company (Deng , 2012). The other factor that will be used to evaluate the implementation process of the one brand strategy is the link between the managers and the strategy. This will involve the structure that the management will offer for implementation of the strategy. Managers are supposed to offer leadership in the organization to ensure that the strategy is implemented as indicated in the plan (Sadler, 2003). Therefore, managers have a responsibility to ensuring that the strategy is effectively implemented. The managers of CCGB will be required to institute structures that promote the adoption of the outlined changes. The managers are also required to design the reward for employees to motivate employees during the process of strategy implementation. Key Issues in One Brand Strategy and it Implementation Process Brand Association: The Company on brand strategy is meant to increase awareness of the differentiated brands by uniting it to be in one brand of Coca Cola. Since Coca Cola is an established brand, target audience will receive the whole information about the four distinct brands the same time. This will help the brands that are not known to be in the limelight in association with the known brand hence informing target consumers of their existence. This was as a result of targeted consumers not aware of the existence of their tailored made drinks of coke. Therefore, the strategy will inform consumers of the variety offered by the company. Health: Due to the developing consciousness of health by the UK society, it important for the company to focus on delivering products that matches their needs. It critical for the Company to consider the societys needs and work on satisfying them by providing products that match specific needs (Graham and Dodd, 2004). Due to increased obesity in the society, the company should be cautious to avoid being blamed for supplying customers with products that have high carioles and sugar. Therefore, having a promotional message for all brands under one umbrella that covers the whole story will enlighten consumers and refer them to products that best serve their needs. Recommendations For the effectiveness of the one brand strategy, the following is recommended; The promotional message should be educative: The message used to advertise the Coca Cola brand should be educative. This will increase the appropriateness of the message by giving the required information to make information. Educative message will give knowledge to the target consumers of different segment hence adopting their respective brand. Involvement in Corporate social responsibilities activities: This will help the company create a positive publicity in a society faced will lifestyle diseases. This will create a relationship between the company and the society. In this process, the company can exchange their informative messages about the different brands and their intended customers (Jeyarathnam, 2008). Use of salespersons for marketing: This inclusion will allow personal appeal in the process of promoting companies products. Consumers will be able to ask questions and get immediate answers. This will increase understanding among consumers of different segments. Conclusion From the evaluation of the one brand strategy of CCGB Company, it clear that the effectiveness of a strategy does not only depend on the formulation of a good strategy but also the effectiveness of the implementation process. The strategy formulated should always have specific, measurable, realistic and attainable goals. This enables the company to adopt the strategy and change for the benefits of the organization. It also shows that the strategic goal should be in line with the companys long term objective. It should serve a part of the long term objective for the attainment of the companys vision. This way, the company will be able to be flexible and change accordingly with the changing macro factors thereby securing it survival in the future. References Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W. (2015). Hyper-organization: Global organizational expansion Bhasin, H. (2016). Marketing strategy of Coca cola - Coca cola strategy. Marketing91.com. Retrieved 9 October 2016, from https://www.marketing91.com/marketing-strategy-of-coca-cola/ Blumeyer .M. (2008.). The Paradox of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrived 9 October 2016, from https://www.paradoxmarketefficiency.com/managingtommorrow/ Coca-Cola Great Britain. (2009). Coca-Cola Great Britain responsible marketing charter: A refreshed approach. Great Britain: Coca-Cola Great Britain. Coca-colacompany.com. (2016). Mission, Vision Values. The Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved 9 October 2016, from https://www.coca-colacompany.com/our-company/mission-vision-values Curtis, J. (2005). Superbrands: An insight into some of Britain's strongest brands 2005. London: Superbrands Ltd. Deng M. (2012). Implementation of Strategies In Contemporary Organization . ASRN Electronic Journal. Fama E. (2001). The Behavior of Stock Market Prices: Journal of Business. 38: 34105 Graham B. and Dodd D . (2004). Forecasting Results Strategically . McGraw-Hill. Jeyarathnam, M. (2008). Strategic management. Mumbai: Himalaya Pub. House. Malkiel B. (2003). Response: The Efficient Market Hypothesis. Science, 244(4911), pp.1424-1425. MOBILISING NETWORKS TO ACHIEVE STRATEGIIC DIFFERENCE. (2002). Long Range Planning, 35(6), 565. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(02)00162-0 Morris, D. (2005). A new tool for strategy analysis: the opportunity model. Journal Of Business Strategy, 26(3), 50-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756660510597100 Sadler, P. (2003). Strategic management. Sterling, VA: Kogan Page. Saloner, G., Shepard, A., Podolny, J. (2001). Strategic management. New York: John Wiley. TSekhar, G. V. S. (2012.). Business policy and strategic management. S.l.: I K International Publi Toryanik, E. (2016). Assessing coke readiness: A response. Coke And Chemistry, 59(5), 204-206. https://dx.doi.org/10.3103/s1068364x16050069 Thompson, J. L., Martin, F. (2010). Strategic management. Andover: Cengage Learning. Uk.coca-cola. (2016). Retrived on 9 October 2016 from Coca- cola.co.uk.https://www.coca-cola.co.uk/stories/coca-cola-one-brand-marketing-strategy Wang, M. (2015). Brief Analysis of Sports Marketing Strategy Adopted by Coca Cola Company. Asian Social Science, 11(23). Retrived on 9 October 2016 from https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n23p22